Crypto Travel Rule Compliance in the United Kingdom

Crypto Travel Rule Compliance in the United Kingdom

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Primary regulation: Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, as amended by SI 2022/860 (Part 7A)
Status: Implemented
Last updated: January 2026

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Primary regulation: Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, as amended by SI 2022/860 (Part 7A)
Status: Implemented
Last updated: January 2026

Executive summary

This page provides an overview of crypto-asset transfer regulation and Travel Rule requirements in the United Kingdom. It is intended for crypto-asset businesses, financial institutions, and compliance teams operating in or interacting with the UK market.

The UK implemented the Travel Rule for crypto-assets on 1 September 2023, integrating FATF-aligned requirements into its existing anti-money laundering framework. The UK approach places particular emphasis on a risk-based framework, especially when interacting with counterparties in jurisdictions where Travel Rule implementation may be incomplete.

This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Regulatory landscape overview

The United Kingdom has been an early and proactive adopter of the FATF Travel Rule for crypto-assets. Rather than introducing a standalone crypto regulation, the UK incorporated Travel Rule obligations directly into its existing AML regime.

The UK framework:

  • Extends Travel Rule obligations to crypto-asset businesses, including exchanges and custodial wallet providers

  • Aligns with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendation 16

  • Operates alongside the UK’s evolving crypto-asset regulatory regime, expected to further align crypto oversight with traditional financial services

This integrated approach results in a comparatively mature and enforcement-focused Travel Rule environment.

Supervisory and regulatory authorities

Crypto-asset Travel Rule compliance in the UK is overseen through a combination of regulatory, legislative, and industry bodies:

  • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): Primary supervisor for AML/CTF compliance and registration of crypto-asset businesses

  • HM Treasury: Responsible for legislative framework and policy direction

  • Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG): Publishes industry guidance, approved by HM Treasury, used by the FCA to assess compliance

All crypto-asset businesses operating in the UK must be registered with the FCA under the Money Laundering Regulations.

Travel Rule status in the United Kingdom

The UK has fully implemented the Travel Rule for crypto-asset transfers through amendments to its AML regulations.

Under the UK framework:

  • Travel Rule obligations apply to qualifying crypto-asset transfers involving UK-registered crypto-asset businesses

  • Required information must be collected, transmitted, and retained in line with regulatory requirements

  • A risk-based approach is applied, particularly in cross-border scenarios and interactions with non-compliant jurisdictions

The UK is considered one of the more operationally mature Travel Rule jurisdictions globally.

Timeline and key milestones

  • July 2022: Legislative amendments adopted to extend Travel Rule obligations to crypto-assets

  • 1 September 2023: Travel Rule obligations become enforceable for FCA-registered crypto-asset businesses

  • 2024–2025: Supervisory focus on implementation quality and risk-based controls

  • Expected from 2026: Introduction of a broader UK crypto-asset regulatory regime, while maintaining existing Travel Rule requirements

Thresholds and scope

The UK applies a tiered approach to Travel Rule data requirements, based on transaction value and counterparty context.

  • All qualifying transfers: Basic originator and beneficiary information is generally required

  • Transfers above defined thresholds: Additional originator information may be required, as set out in regulation

  • Domestic UK transfers: Certain simplified data-sharing arrangements may apply when both counterparties are UK-based, subject to information availability upon request

This tiered structure reflects the UK’s emphasis on proportionality and risk-based controls.

Required data elements (high-level)

For in-scope crypto-asset transfers, UK rules generally require information relating to:

  • The originator, including identifying details and account or transaction identifiers

  • The beneficiary, including identifying details and account or transaction identifiers

Additional data elements may be required for higher-value or higher-risk transfers, as defined in regulation and supporting guidance. Firms are expected to retain relevant information and make it available to the FCA upon request.

Local nuances and interpretive considerations

Several features of the UK framework are particularly relevant for compliance teams:

  • Risk-based assessment: UK firms are expected to assess counterparty risk, particularly when interacting with jurisdictions where Travel Rule implementation is incomplete

  • Domestic flexibility: Transfers between UK-based crypto-asset businesses may follow simplified data-sharing models, subject to information being made available when requested

  • Supervisory scrutiny: FCA supervision places emphasis on governance, controls, and auditability rather than purely technical implementation

These elements make defensible decision-making and strong audit trails especially important.

Cross-border and interoperability considerations

UK-based crypto-asset businesses frequently interact with global counterparties operating under different regulatory regimes.

The FCA has acknowledged the operational challenges associated with the “sunrise issue”, where required Travel Rule data may not be immediately available from non-compliant jurisdictions.

Key considerations include:

  • Attempting to obtain missing information for inbound transfers

  • Retaining required information for outbound transfers, even where counterparties cannot yet receive it

  • Applying documented, risk-based decisions where information cannot be obtained

Interoperability and structured information requests play an important role in managing these scenarios.

Indicative compliance readiness checklist

The following considerations are illustrative and non-exhaustive:

  • FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations

  • Ability to apply tiered data requirements based on transaction value and risk

  • Processes to identify counterparty Travel Rule readiness

  • Controls for assessing transfers involving self-custodied wallets

  • Record-keeping aligned with UK AML retention requirements